Quote:
Originally Posted by wes
All of this is hearsay unless someone puts these on a shock dyno to show their curve and what the adjustments do..... Track comparisons, how they feel, how they compare to AGX's, etc.... is nothing more than a butt dyno. It is like saying that after you installed cams your ass told you they made 15 WHP, only your butt dyno is probably more accurate than your butt shock dyno.
I know I quoted you Tekkie but my post is directed at all of the speculation around what is good and what is not based on people impressions rather than dyno.'s...
|
I know where you're coming from, but that's the way of the world. Many are more easily swayed on someone's impression of a product, than anything else. The average driver that does the occasional track day, cares more about the way they feel, than what numbers show. Track junkies even still, in my opinion, care more about the experience with the product, than just numbers on a piece of paper.
Quote:
|
Of course Honda and Nissan have entirely different suspension geometries, (In my opinion, Honda having better stock suspension) so the MR coilover setup could very well be far better on our platform, than for use on a Honda platform.
|
I also recall stating the above. It's HIGHLY possible that the MR coilover system is better suited on our chassis, than it was on various Honda platforms.
For instance, I run with the AGX/RM setup, and I didn't need numbers to tell me that they were going to be awesome. Couple it with the Cusco FSTB and I absolutely love the cornering ability, as well as the ride comfort.
Is it the best? Obviously not. Does it work for me, and what I want the car to be able to do? HELL yes.
