Nissan SR20 Forum Nissan SR20 Forum Header Right

Welcome to the SR20 Forum!

A community of enthusiasts dedicated to Nissan's SR20DE/SR20VE/SR20DET engines.
Start here: forum search. Be sure to search on what you're looking for before posting a new thread.

You are currently browsing the forum as a guest. In order to access special features, the image gallery, and post you will need to be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator.

Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors

Sponsors


Go Back   SR20 Forum > Main Forums > All Motor



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2007, 07:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
AJ4
Project SR24DES

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)

Copper head spacer idea

I'm trying to think of useful ways to increase my rod/crank ratio by spacing the head off a bit ( 2.4 litre SR20DET ).

I have Darton sleeves with a 5mm thick lip all the way around the top of the sleeve that would normally need seating into the cylinder so it lies flush with the top of the block. Would this work though - fitting the sleever so it sits with the lip on top of the block and using a copper spacer/gasket of the same thickness as the lip ?

I thought maybe if the liners were installed and the liner / spacer machined as one, the softer copper would spring back up slightly proud of the liners. When the head is torqued down, most of the compression force is on the face of the liners but a small amount would act on the copper as well. The copper wouldn't have to seal that well as its only containing water and oil lines, not any combustive forces.

Am I going about this in entirely the wrong way or does it sound like something worth investigating ? I've seen head spacers before that are fitted almost permanently to the head and milled through to fit the liners, but with this idea the spacer could be lifted on and off easily and doesn't have to be a perfect fit to the liner ( the liner is permanently fitted to the block and is prevented from dropping by the lip ). This would also minimise milling the recess for the lip into the head as its a bit of a headache...

Any thought, comments, suggestions are appreciated, or any alternate ideas or methods to space the head off most welcome. One final thought, the piston pins are fitted as high up in the piston as possible, so no room for improvement there unfortunately

Cheers,

Ross.

AJ4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-31-2007, 08:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
爆走

 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SanDiego,CA
Trader Rating: 1 (100%)

it is a difficulty with regard tot the chain. i added 1 inch spacer once and that was the most difficulty. there are 2 companies in japan doing a similar thing but the use a 4mm aluminum spacer and 2 gaskets above the liner. they do this for the RB26 and one of the companies is OS Giken. they just run the piston up intot he gasket space and the crown thickness is a minimum of 6mm to make it work so the rings dont fall out of the liner into the gasket. the RB uses a belt which makes it easier. 5mm spacer would add about .5in chain length. it is easier and cheaper to gain up to 6-8mm with longer rod and adjusted pinheight on a custom piston.
__________________
http://www.bigtomsgarage.com
bigtom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 09:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
54C PWNS ME

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tampa,FL
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)

is that the RB30 package from OS Giken you are referring to?
__________________
1993 NX2000
JimmyNX2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 08:49 PM   #4 (permalink)
AJ4
Project SR24DES

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)

I did think about raising the pin but its near impossible on the piston design I have ( CP's ). The pin is almost cutting into the oil control ring as it is, and I don't see how they could drop the ring land width any more and put the rings closer together. The only option would be to lose the second ring altogether but the engine is designed for low rpm torque and having only two rings total wouldn't work too well until high rpm.

I think theres probably enough adjustment in our chains to get a 0.5 inch increase in length, especially if I use an older one that been stretched a bit already.
AJ4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 09:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
爆走

 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SanDiego,CA
Trader Rating: 1 (100%)

i have done it reliable running the pin 6.85mm higher and still running the .866 pin. if you rebush the rod you can gain a little more. NA this setup has worked fine. this used a 6.85 mm longer rod and still has 3 rings. this is the max i would do. you can go more making the pin even smaller and using an oil rail support where the pin is in the oil ring then max is about 8mm.

if you want a set of these rods/pistons let me know. the rods are reasonable but the pistons are expensive and weigh around 240g with pin and even less with Ti pins.

if you already have the pistons i guess your stuck there, but if its just a design maybe you should redesign it.

if you must go your spacer way i dont recommend the copper if you want it to last. go with the proven AL spacer 2 gasket system OSG has for the RB30 kit.

hope the info helps. good luck to you.

Last edited by bigtom : 02-01-2007 at 09:32 PM.
bigtom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 06:03 AM   #6 (permalink)
AJ4
Project SR24DES

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)

Unfortunately I already have the pistons and really want to keep them. Thanks for the suggestions about the 2 gasket system, I'll look into it
AJ4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply



  SR20 Forum > Main Forums > All Motor


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© The SR20 Forum - Content from this site may not be used without permission