Nissan SR20 Forum Nissan SR20 Forum Header Right

Welcome to the SR20 Forum!

A community of enthusiasts dedicated to Nissan's SR20DE/SR20VE/SR20DET engines.
Start here: forum search. Be sure to search on what you're looking for before posting a new thread.

You are currently browsing the forum as a guest. In order to access special features, the image gallery, and post you will need to be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator.

Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors

Sponsors


Go Back   SR20 Forum > Motorsports > Autocross & Rally Racing



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-20-2006, 06:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tools on order
 
trance34's Avatar

I support the SR20 Forum!
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: IL
Trader Rating: 7 (100%)

spring rate/front sway question

I have been Auotcrossing an RSX this year and it seems the RSX owners are divided on how to keep the power on the ground in the most effective manner.

here is one users take

My $.02 regarding LSD's and Front anti-roll bars....

Yes, LSD's can reduce inside wheel spin and help corner exits.. HOWEVER, this is in trade of an increase in throttle on Understeer. So even a car with an LSD would benifit from the increase in front end traction of having a smaller front bar.

why? Because anti-roll bars in their effort to resist chassis roll artificially increase the amount of weight being transfered on the end of the car they are on. And weight transfer = A reduction in overall traction on that end of the car.... So, in a car with out an LSD you end up Spinning the inside front tire more easily (with a big bar) or Reducing inside wheel spin (with a small/no bar) and on a Car WITH an LSD you end up Having More throttle on understeer (with a big bar) or you reduce throttle on understeer (with a small/no front bar).

Thoughts?
__________________
2000 Sentra SE-T
2005 Pathfinder SE
FS 2004 Jetta GLI
trance34 is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-20-2006, 06:55 PM   #2 (permalink)
SE-R Nutcase

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)
LSD = Good.

Lots of front roll stiffness (whether it's from bar or spring) = Good.

Set up the rest of the car around those two.
__________________
Andy
'91 SE-R
'04 AWD OMG WTF LOL STi L8R
maxQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 09:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
Tools on order
 
trance34's Avatar

I support the SR20 Forum!
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: IL
Trader Rating: 7 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by maxQ
LSD = Good.

Lots of front roll stiffness (whether it's from bar or spring) = Good.

Set up the rest of the car around those two.

Yes I am aware of this.

Basically what I am asking is that would you run stiffer springs up front and a smaller sway bar, or a larger sway bar and a normal race spring.

So lets look at this in SE-R terms. 400 is a pretty stiff front rate. Lets say you run that and a bigger front bar. Or would you rather run a 600 front spring and a smaller then stock, or no front bar?
trance34 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2006, 10:34 PM   #4 (permalink)
70/30 Racing
 
Rockwood's Avatar

I support the SR20 Forum!
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Trader Rating: 1 (100%)

Depends.

Looking for easy oversteer? No front bar.

Looking for balance and more traction? Run a front bar.

It's all about balance. With 400F rates, I would run 350R rates with a 1" rear bar and the stock front bar. LSDs actually reduce understeer by balancing the power between the two front wheels, as long as the breakaway isn't too bad.
__________________
Steve Rockwood
98 200SX SE-R - Ginormous Turbo - 12.23 @ 129.8mph (street tires)
2002 F150 - 5.4L of towing powah!
92 G20 - PTD #73
Rockwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 08:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
SE. Period.

 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Louis
Trader Rating: 1 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by trance34
why? Because anti-roll bars in their effort to resist chassis roll artificially increase the amount of weight being transfered on the end of the car they are on. And weight transfer = A reduction in overall traction on that end of the car....
Uh i thought weight transfer would increase the end of the car that is having weight transferred to it. More force is being applied towards the ground, the normal force increases, and thus the limit of the frictional force is increased.
However, you lose friction where the weight transfers away from by the same idea.
iMagnusX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2006, 10:21 AM   #6 (permalink)
SE-R Nutcase

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)
Quote:
Originally Posted by trance34
Yes I am aware of this.

Basically what I am asking is that would you run stiffer springs up front and a smaller sway bar, or a larger sway bar and a normal race spring.

So lets look at this in SE-R terms. 400 is a pretty stiff front rate. Lets say you run that and a bigger front bar. Or would you rather run a 600 front spring and a smaller then stock, or no front bar?

If the front roll stiffness is the same between the two and the swaybar doesn't bind, what's the difference?

The only thing that makes a difference is whether you have shocks that can handle the high(er) spring rate and if you want to reduce dive and squat (for which you want high spring rates and a smaller bar).

Last edited by maxQ : 06-26-2006 at 10:22 AM.
maxQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply



  SR20 Forum > Motorsports > Autocross & Rally Racing


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© The SR20 Forum - Content from this site may not be used without permission