b13 rear end height difference. - SR20 Forum
Nissan SR20 Forum Nissan SR20 Forum Header Right
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us

Welcome to the SR20 Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   SR20 Forum > Main Forums > Chassis & Suspension



Sr20Forum.com is the premier Nissan SR20 Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2007, 12:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
Out of hibernation.

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Homegrown, IOWA

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
b13 rear end height difference.

Just got done installing my AGX/ road magnet setup on my 93 b13. Besides the usual clunk, squeak problems( I have plenty ideas to fix) the rear end has about 1/2 inch height difference between the two sides. I have made sure the springs are seated right, and there is still the difference. I used the rubber hose method on both sides, and ended up taking it off on the drivers side, reducing the difference down to 1/4 inch. Is my rear sway bar possibly the culprit? Has anyone else had this problem?

btw, I've searched and searched on this forum and come up blank.
PJ93 SE-R is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-20-2007, 05:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
Out of hibernation.

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Homegrown, IOWA

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
nobody?
PJ93 SE-R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 06:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
Robusto

 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Maryland

Feedback Score: 88 reviews
maybe on one of the sides you have the 2 springs mixed up?
The front springs are made of a slightly thicker diameter wire. I'd check that
__________________
Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.
robchaos19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 08:07 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tired!
 
coach's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dry Ridge, KY

Feedback Score: 43 reviews
Yeah man, seems like you got something mixed up man!

brent
__________________
Coach - EEN Member/The Fist Don't F with me!
1993 NX 2000 -- Slate Grey Metallic
1999 SE-L -- back to NA form

Lovefab.com Go Fast Depot - FTW!
coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 10:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
Out of hibernation.

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Homegrown, IOWA

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Besides a diff. spring rate, two front springs are also taller. The rears were both the same hieght when I set them side by side. 3 of the four sides look perfect, but the drivers side has too much of a rake to it. I know the springs are in the right spot. when the car sits on the ground, looking between the tire, and quarter panel, you can see one spring is compressed more than the other. That's why I belive maybe something is keeping that side from going too low? It's not noticeable to everybody, but it's phreakin drivn me crazy!
PJ93 SE-R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 11:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
KASSANOVA!!!

 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fresno, California

Feedback Score: 47 reviews
i'd say drive around with it for a week, and try to have 4 people in the car. maybe the springs will slowly shift into place???
__________________
92 Dark Gray Sentra SER

92 Red Sentra SER
bobbyisking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 05:45 PM   #7 (permalink)
Out of hibernation.

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Homegrown, IOWA

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Before:


and after:

this is the good side. the rear on the other side sits just a bit higher. there is already a good amount of rake to it, just imagine another half an inch. I know I didn't mix up the fronts with the rears, or the nose would be sitting on the ground, because the rear springs were considerably shorter than the fronts.
PJ93 SE-R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 05:53 PM   #8 (permalink)
Out of hibernation.

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Homegrown, IOWA

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I forgot to mention ruling out the struts as the problem. I installed the springs on the stock struts to get a good look, and noticed the difference back then. I figured the old or new or mixed up stockers were playing tricks on me. But the new agx's are treating it the same.

sorry about the long thread, but it's not very often I am at a loss like this. please help!
PJ93 SE-R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 06:14 PM   #9 (permalink)
Robusto

 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Maryland

Feedback Score: 88 reviews
Quote:
i'd say drive around with it for a week, and try to have 4 people in the car. maybe the springs will slowly shift into place???

I second that. Maybe one of the springs isn't seated quite right.
take a picture of the other side too just for people to see what you are talking about.

Last edited by robchaos19; 09-21-2007 at 06:16 PM.
robchaos19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 08:40 PM   #10 (permalink)
Fun Hater

 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tulsa,OK

Feedback Score: 3 reviews
I still second guess myself on my spring set up all the time.They all looked the same length to me so I installed the thinner looking ones in the rear.After about a week I got out the trusty dial calipers and measured the spring thickness and I had them set up right.The only thing that bugs me is my front sits higher than the rear.But I have taken a lot of weight off the front end.

They will settle in after a week of driving so give that a shot first.
__________________
91'SE-R

NO WAR FOR HEAVY METAL!!

Last edited by grinch77; 09-21-2007 at 08:42 PM.
grinch77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 08:50 PM   #11 (permalink)
Robusto

 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Maryland

Feedback Score: 88 reviews
the front does not sit higher. On the B13s, the rear fender design looks lower then the front. It touches on that in shawnBs suspension thread and a couple others out there.
robchaos19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 08:55 PM   #12 (permalink)
Out of hibernation.

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Homegrown, IOWA

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I only drive it a few times a week, so it might take longer. I've got a few buds coming over tonight, and I'll take them all for a little joyride on some twisties. That is if the roads dry up. I appreciate all the input, and I'll give it some time before I freak out.
btw, don't think for a second I regret my road magnet decision. Thanks to robchaos. These springs are great. Paired with the agx's I can't imagine a better ride. I got rid of the clunks and sqeaks, and the car only has 80,000 miles so it feels solid as hell.
I think I might start a thread asking for before and after pics of the rm gen 2 setup, and everyone's opinion. later......
PJ93 SE-R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 10:07 PM   #13 (permalink)
Robusto

 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Maryland

Feedback Score: 88 reviews
Give it a few days. I remember when I first got the springs on my car sometimes I would look at it for a minute and think to myself that it seemed a little uneven, but right now I still have the original test set from the round 1 GB on my car (yeah haha I'm lazy.) and they have held up outstandingly and the drop still looks perfect. Mind you that this is on a test set (unshotpeened and not powdercoated.)

There are some pictures out there.

http://www.sr20forum.com/members-rid...ht=road+magnet
http://www.sr20forum.com/members-rides/211437-car.html
robchaos19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 10:37 PM   #14 (permalink)
Fun Hater

 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tulsa,OK

Feedback Score: 3 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by robchaos19 View Post
the front does not sit higher. On the B13s, the rear fender design looks lower then the front. It touches on that in shawnBs suspension thread and a couple others out there.


I have read that and can tell the difference but for some reason it just mentally screws with me.My mild OCD makes me think I screwed something up.
grinch77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2007, 10:47 PM   #15 (permalink)
Out of hibernation.

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Homegrown, IOWA

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
usually I sit back and think it looks great, but I sometimes wonder if I did something wrong. Not much different than the mother of my two kids Just got back from a pretty fun ride, pulled some G's with a bunch of weight in the back. We'll see. Everyones here, time to put down the keys, and start drinkin. Thanks you guys! toast
PJ93 SE-R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 06:11 AM   #16 (permalink)
SE-R Lightweight

 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norcal, Ca

Feedback Score: 7 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ93 SE-R View Post
I only drive it a few times a week, so it might take longer. I've got a few buds coming over tonight, and I'll take them all for a little joyride on some twisties. That is if the roads dry up. I appreciate all the input, and I'll give it some time before I freak out.
btw, don't think for a second I regret my road magnet decision. Thanks to robchaos. These springs are great. Paired with the agx's I can't imagine a better ride. I got rid of the clunks and sqeaks, and the car only has 80,000 miles so it feels solid as hell.
I think I might start a thread asking for before and after pics of the rm gen 2 setup, and everyone's opinion. later......
may i ask you what was causing your squeaks and clunks? my agx/rm springs are driving me crazy over bumps but only in the rear on my b14.
__________________
96 200sx ser
lbto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 01:53 AM   #17 (permalink)
Drivin the "Egg Crate"

 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada

Feedback Score: 5 reviews
PJ93,

OK, a couple of things come to mind; when you verified the springs were seated right, we you refering to just being centered in the perches, or did you also verify that the end of the spring that sits in the lower perch is rotated fully so the end of the coil comes in contact with the detent on the perch (if someone is familiar with this setup, and that detail does not apply, please call BS and correct me. I don't want misinformation out there).

When you did the work on the suspension, perchance did you have the suspension mount points (and/or swaybar links) loosened on one side with the wheels of the other touching the ground? The OEM rubber mounts are not mobile in the same way as the polyurethane ones, and you must have the car down on all four wheels prior to torquing to spec, otherwise you will preload, and potentially jack one side of the car.

You mentioned the swaybar. You might check both the back and front for binding. One sure fire way to check that the swaybars are not responsible for the preload, is to detach them at both end links. Then, you are relying solely on the springs to support the weight of the vehicle (after giving the suspension a bit of a bounce to remove any residual friction from the struts, etc).

Hope we can sort this for you!

Darrin
__________________
Sad little 91 NX... recovering nicely!
SkyShepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  SR20 Forum > Main Forums > Chassis & Suspension


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
© The SR20 Forum - Content from this site may not be used without permission