Any constructive ideas on how to correct camber change angles? - Page 3 - SR20 Forum
Nissan SR20 Forum Nissan SR20 Forum Header Right
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us

Welcome to the SR20 Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   SR20 Forum > Main Forums > Chassis & Suspension



Sr20Forum.com is the premier Nissan SR20 Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2009, 08:11 PM   #41 (permalink)
SE-R Master

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I have suspension techniques springs on gr2s but will (after brakes and control arms) move on to CSKs with my own coilovers. the springs i think are 1.5 inch drop. I may be a little offwith the BJ drop. I figured it would have to match the height loss from stock. so that is where i got 1.5" from.
companyman95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-17-2009, 12:57 PM   #42 (permalink)
SE-R Master

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
OK so i am looking at using the b14 LCAs as they are 1 inch wider than the b13's (from pivot to BJ center) and am looking at additional methods to correct the geometry andtrying to AVOID going to 17s. so the only ways to improve the camber change curve are----

1. move the LCA pivot (chasis side)
2. move the top of the strut
3. drop the balljoint
4. go fab crazy with rocker arms attached to remote coilovers under the hood (F1 style)

i just need accurate numbers as to how much BJ is needed. i have been operating under the assumption that the drop should match the chassis lowering. I think a combination of moving the top of the strut towards the center of the car AND dropping the balljoint. I do not intend to adjust camber by using crash bolts (the opposite in fact) I may (when i go to csk's) use my own strut tubes and make adjustments to the spindle mount bolt arrangement so that the strut top will not affect STATIC camber....just brainstorming here.....i am aware that the strut top would have to be moved to aggressive angles to make this work.....im desperate not to use heavy expensive 17s. Hell since i have access to them FREE i can switch my Altima hubs for Maxima hubs with 10mm spacer and use z32 wheels 16x7.5 45mm off
and still keeping with my stock parts usage preferance.
companyman95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 01:01 PM   #43 (permalink)
SE-R Master

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Calling MR K.

wow thats interesting..Mr K. was the guy who made the z happen (coincidence?)..i am looking for help fom Mr Kojima anyone talk to him? He may have the last piece to this puzzle.
companyman95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 01:41 PM   #44 (permalink)
SE-R Master

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Basic Geometry

as it sits the center of the chassis side pivot is 4 1/4 inches from the ground and the center of the ball joint to the ground is 5 1/4" giving a difference of....wait for it...1 inch so if we could measure the lean of the centerline of the strut and ball joint then we have the answer we need. the ? is how much drop do we need to correct the camber change?
companyman95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 12:20 AM   #45 (permalink)
SE-R Newbie

 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hillsboro, OR

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Why not get some paper and draw out all the suspension points at stock and lowered? Roll the car and see how this moves the suspension points and changes camber on the tire.

Try moving the ball joint or the LCA pivot points and see what happens as you roll the car again.

Goal is to try and minimize camber change "loss".

I think this is going to very hard to achieve camber "gain" with a MacPhereson Strut suspension.
summerjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2009, 12:28 AM   #46 (permalink)
SE-R Master

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
camber change happens with relation to the angle of the strut to ball joint and LCA pivot to BJ....if this angle is less than 90 degrees CAMBER CHANGE WILL BE NEGATIVE...if this angle is 90 degrees or over it will add positive camber...this is true for all suspensions i can think of others are just measured slightly different....so....dropping the ball joint is the most logical way to accomplish this....we are just trying to figure out the drop necessary and how to get there......i am almost there with a set of B14 arms which are 1" longer than B13 LCAs.
companyman95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 05:07 AM   #47 (permalink)
I hurt tires
 
sr20speed's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Union City, CA

Feedback Score: 11 reviews
If you want to know what you need, you need to take the measurements and plot some points. Once you know where you stand, you can determine where you want the roll center height to be and figure out how much you need to adjust to achieve, or at least get close to that height.

There are many reasons to correct the geometry. You seem to be concerned mainly with the camber change aspect of it. That being said, any improvement is going to be beneficial here. That being said, you could go ahead and drop the ball joint as much as your setup will allow, for whatever wheel setup you choose.

Now a larger issue here is the roll center height itself. Placing the roll center at an optimum height would be a better way of determining the amount the ball joint needs to drop. There is not some set spot that you need to set it at. It depends on your setup and your own driving preference. In fact, you may never get the geometry perfect, however that doesn't mean you can't get it close.

If you are unsure of what you need to do, you can follow Kojima's setup. I never got a specific measurement from him, but from what I can tell. it only appears he dropped the ball joint pivot one inch from the stock location. I know the pictures make it appear the pivot is way lower, but it really looks to only be about an inch lower. This is the same setup he uses on the Dog Car II and III and his B14 street car (which all sit at different ride heights). His setup seemed to be dictated by the limitations of the hardware (meaning he could only drop the pivot as much as the mono ball pin would allow) and he was trying to achieve as close to zero bumpsteer as possible. Where exactly the roll center height ended up in all this, I'm not sure. But I know Kojima has said two inches above ground is a good spot.

Anyways, anything you can do will probably help. You could drop the pivot a mere 1/4 inch and it would still be better then stock. Like I said, you may never get it perfect, but anything you do achieve will most likely be better then stock.

Put it this way: Lets look at it piece by piece.

In regards to the camber curve, depending on your ride height, you could be either + or - 90°. Regardless, it is safe to say that any improvement (meaning any amount you drop the ball joint pivot) will net some improvement. Suppose in the VERY unlikely situation you drop the pivot so much that you have too much camber gain, you would simply run less static camber. What I'm trying to say is, I wouldn't worry so much about the camber curve as it will only get better.

In regards to Roll Center, one thing is for sure, just as we don't want the camber curve to get any worse, we don't want the roll center to drop even more. More then likely any adjustment in the range you have to work with will net an improvement. At a set ride height, any amount you drop the ball joint pivot, the roll center will get higher. If you were only concerned with the roll center, the only danger you face is lowering the pivot too much and bringing the roll center up too high, which is very unlikely, but something to consider none the less.

Now, something you seem to not mention much is the issue of bumpsteer. I'm not sure what you plans are here, but you should be looking into bumpsteer correction before you do any of the roll center stuff. Even with the stock control arm and ball joint there is a serious need for bumpsteer correction. If you lower the ball joint without changing the steering geometry, you will have unbelievable amounts of bumpsteer. You should REALLY consider doing the bumpsteer correction before anything else. The bumpsteer is really going to dictate a lot. With the stock control arm position, you want to be able to drop the rod end pivot as much as possible while still leaving the rod end above the spindle. Ideally, you would want the rod end pivot even lower but, you can only go so low, and mounting the steering rod end under the spindle is too far. However, when you drop the ball joint pivot and the angle or the control arm changes, you will need to drop the steering rod end pivot lower as well. Here is where bumpsteer correction dictates the roll center adjustments. You need to make sure you are dropping the ball joint pivot far enough so that mounting the steering below the spindle isn't too low (if that makes sense). Say you only drop the ball joint pivot a 1/2 inch, the sweet spot to reduce bumpsteer may be unobtainable due to the the fact that we can only mount the steering arm above or below the spindle, leaving a range of adjustment we can't use.

So yeah, that is all my tired brain can think of at the moment. I hope that helps.

I am working on a similar but different solution, so I will post things as I figure out more.

Last edited by sr20speed; 04-10-2009 at 05:11 AM.
sr20speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 12:20 AM   #48 (permalink)
SE-R Master

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
well here is a weird one for you....i now have z32 front brakes necessitating a spindle change to an altima spindle/ g20t axles ect....the arm for the tie rod end is more toward the center of the car than stock...i cut more threads onto the inner rod for adjustability but.....i will be using maxima spindles to mount my z32 wheels so i need to measure the spindle to avoid any more mishaps....i should check the distance from the center of the axle hole to the face of the BJ hole and compare to stock....before someone smarts off i am using z wheels because the are light have appropriate NEW tires and are...FREE. as well as giving me more clearance for BJ dropping without the dreaded 17s.

Side note thanks sr20speed...you obviously have more than a clue and it is reassuring to know that i haven't lost my mind or at least i'm not the only one

Last edited by companyman95; 04-13-2009 at 12:22 AM.
companyman95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 04:03 AM   #49 (permalink)
I hurt tires
 
sr20speed's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Union City, CA

Feedback Score: 11 reviews
So you currently have altima spindles? but now you are switching to maxima spindles? That might make things interesting. Be careful that the steering arm on the spindle is not too radically different. I'm not 100% sure, but I'd imagine that could throw off the ackerman angle/effect. Plus, you are going to want to be careful not to shorten the steering tie rod too much, as doing so will hurt turning radius.

However, the upside to using a different spindle, as you seem to already suspect, would be the possibility of the ball joint mounting tab being positioned lower. If the the spindle is in fact longer in that respect, you could effectively lower the ball joint some without even tweaking the control arm. However, I'd imagine if there is a difference, it would be minor.

It is certainly interesting to consider, but could make things worse off in the end. Make sure to consider the relationship between the control arm and steering tie rod in all of this.

Post some pictures of the different spindles if you can. I'm curious to see the differences.
sr20speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 12:17 AM   #50 (permalink)
SE-R Master

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
The steering arm from stock SE-R to altima is 1/8" toward the center of the car at the same height. making its effects minimal...i can however post pics of the max. spindle with the little SE-R chunk as the altima spindle is on the car...on a side note...why has no one suggested moving the steering rack slightly to adjust bump steer characteristics? I mean...i just put urethane steering rack bushings in and the rack had plenty of room to move up.
companyman95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 02:00 AM   #51 (permalink)
I hurt tires
 
sr20speed's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Union City, CA

Feedback Score: 11 reviews
Moving the steering rack is not an easy task, nor do I think you can move it enough to eliminate/reduce the bumpsteer.
sr20speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 04:50 PM   #52 (permalink)
VVL sucks in pedestrians

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada

Feedback Score: 5 reviews
Interesting thread, any new developments with this?
__________________
NX2000 - VE transplant in progress...
Wojtek1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  SR20 Forum > Main Forums > Chassis & Suspension


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
© The SR20 Forum - Content from this site may not be used without permission