Finally Dynoed The VVL: Results Pics and video inside...

Spoolin_RB · 10-12-2006, 11:11 PM

178hp 142tq

93.13 Degrees F 31% Humidity

Mods:

HKS Filter Short Ram
SSAC Header with 2.5in Secondaries
3in VRS Full Exhaust System
Nismo FPR
SAFC 2

Video Of Pull 3

Special Thanks to

Dre

Kenniel

Lance

Rob

and my audience lol

rex · 10-12-2006, 11:19 PM

How did you gain by tuning the safc 2?

myprojectB13 · 10-12-2006, 11:19 PM

Does the Society of Automotive Engineers not exist in Florida?

Spoolin_RB · 10-12-2006, 11:21 PM

Car went on the rollers at 170 whp I believe and 132 TQ what they really cleaned up for me was my a/f ratio it was all over the place...

greense-rious · 10-12-2006, 11:26 PM

sound nice man

coryb13ser · 10-12-2006, 11:38 PM

i think you mean 2.5in secondary, otherwise thats a huge header.

nice vid

5speed · 10-12-2006, 11:49 PM

Had me scare there for a moment, thought you guys in South Florida was going to pop out another 200 hp stock cam ve.

Good job on the dyno. Damn, the ve is still loud with the stock cam.

Spoolin_RB · 10-12-2006, 11:56 PM

Many thanks and yea its secondaries i had a brain fart been a long day lol...

prince nismo · 10-13-2006, 12:01 AM

sweet! great numbers man!

Nismo87SE · 10-13-2006, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by myprojectB13

Does the Society of Automotive Engineers not exist in Florida?

LOL according to the weather conditions SAE power on his dyno would've been 174whp/139wtq.

Benito Malito · 10-13-2006, 12:21 AM

Sounds sweet. What MAF/ECU/INJ combo is this on?

Andreas Miko · 10-13-2006, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nismo87SE

LOL according to the weather conditions SAE power on his dyno would've been 174whp/139wtq.

I disagree.

SAE readings are done at 77 degrees. This means if the temp was hotter than that the dyno at SAE would read higher.

If the temp was say 50 degrees the dyno would have read higher and at SAE the reading would have been lower.

macakin · 10-13-2006, 12:28 AM

Nice numbers congratss and enjoy them

Andreas Miko · 10-13-2006, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nismo87SE

LOL according to the weather conditions SAE power on his dyno would've been 174whp/139wtq.

Just to ask a question when you ran 13.57 at 99 MPH what did you have on your car to do so and how musch NOS were you spraying

urbanracerone · 10-13-2006, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andreas Miko

Just to ask a question when you ran 13.57 at 99 MPH what did you have on your car to do so and how musch NOS were you spraying

JUN

Spoolin_RB · 10-13-2006, 04:05 AM

-------------------

its stock de ecu

stock ve inj

stock de maf

SE-Rican · 10-13-2006, 05:46 AM

I think the car did well. I will say it again by far a very fun car to drive.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andreas Miko

Just to ask a question when you ran 13.57 at 99 MPH what did you have on your car to do so and how musch NOS were you spraying

X2

mpg9999 · 10-13-2006, 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andreas Miko

I disagree.

SAE readings are done at 85 degrees. This means if the temp was hotter than that the dyno at SAE would read higher.

If the temp was say 50 degrees the dyno would have read higher and at SAE the reading would have been lower.

I disagree.

SAE not only takes into consideration temperature, but humidity and atmospheric pressure as well. You could have a really high temp, but very low humidity and high pressure, and the SAE corrected numbers would be lower.

mpg9999 · 10-13-2006, 06:29 AM

Plugging his numbers into the SAE equation gives a correction factor pretty close to one.

Andreas Miko · 10-13-2006, 06:29 AM

In this case on this dyno, the figures would not be lower.

The temp is 93 degrees
Presure is 30 in-Hg
Humidity is 31%