some dissapointing results - SR20 Forum
Nissan SR20 Forum Nissan SR20 Forum Header Right
HomeForumGalleryClassifiedsAbout UsAdvertiseContact Us

Welcome to the SR20 Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   SR20 Forum > Main Forums > SR20VE / SR16VE



Sr20Forum.com is the premier Nissan SR20 Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-19-2007, 11:08 AM   #1 (permalink)
the proof wizard

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota

Feedback Score: 26 reviews
some dissapointing results

4-1 with sr16ve (blue) vs sr16veN1 cams (red)

sr16 switch @ 4800
N1 switch @ 5700


ssac w 2.5 (blue) vs custom 4-1 (red). test done w N1 cams



N1 cams, straight up (red) vs +4/-4 (blue).



the numbers are just for comparisons, i didnt tune these runs. also dont mind the afr, it seems as though the slip fit is leaking a bit causing the wack afrs.

and just for refrence something is not right with my car.... something since i was on the dyno last is holding me back about 10whp... this chart shows what im talking about

this is a chart of the N1s with ssac vs the sr16 cams with the ssac. the N1s are the lower runs... now i need to find out what going on. so as you can see the car should be making more power. this was a dyno from before i put the valve springs and cams in. its from a few months ago. now the n1 dyno is as of a few weeks ago, and so somehting in that time frame is the cause?? this dyno reads 5% low compaired to a dynojet (ive tested this), so sr16 cams made 197whp back then.

__________________
12sec NA

Last edited by coryb13ser; 09-22-2007 at 08:23 PM.
coryb13ser is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-19-2007, 11:15 AM   #2 (permalink)
Air Force SE-R freak!!!!!
 
Dick's Avatar

I support the SR20 Forum!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Panama City, FL

Feedback Score: 52 reviews
wow those are disapointing numbers
__________________
95' b14 SE-R w/ sr20ve
93' b13 SE-R w/ sr20ve
95' 240sx SE

Where to buy all your b13 and b14 cosmetic modifications>>>>>>www.rapidcustoms.com
Dick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 11:19 AM   #3 (permalink)
the proof wizard

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota

Feedback Score: 26 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick View Post
wow those are disapointing numbers
especially because i was at 197whp back before i touched anything
coryb13ser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 11:25 AM   #4 (permalink)
Done.

 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 'Deen, MD

Feedback Score: 27 reviews
Should you really hold the comparison as truth, considering you used two different dynos, on two different days? Atmospheric conditions, as well as different dyno hardware will always yield different results, IIRC.
__________________
SR20DEEP MD

05 Armada - Tow Truck
04 Subaru WRX 'goon
Cliff está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 11:28 AM   #5 (permalink)
the proof wizard

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota

Feedback Score: 26 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeKKiE View Post
Should you really hold the comparison as truth, considering you used two different dynos, on two different days? Atmospheric conditions, as well as different dyno hardware will always yield different results, IIRC.

what are you talking about? all numbers are in SAE which account for atm, temp and other changes... both comparisons are on the same dyno. i have one showing that N1 make more power than 16. and another comparing the N1 run vs my old sr16 set up. however n1s still not as much as i made with 16s before. so something has changed other then cams/headers and dropped my power...

Last edited by coryb13ser; 09-19-2007 at 11:38 AM.
coryb13ser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 11:50 AM   #6 (permalink)
greek vvl

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Athens, Greece

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Both dynos, old and new, in the same gear?
bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 01:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
SE-R Nut

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jo'burg

Feedback Score: 0 reviews
very wierd. cam timing okay on the n1 runs?
Sabre 200 Gxi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2007, 11:28 PM   #8 (permalink)
WWJD

 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CoralSprings,Fla

Feedback Score: 7 reviews
Slap a T25 OR T28 Kit on her and all your disappointment will vanish
__________________
91 Gxe auto(SOLD)
91 Turbo SER(CRASHED)
91 Turbo SER(SOLD)
01 Acura CL Type-S(TRADED IN)
04 Acura TSX(stolen)
06 GSXR 600(crashed via little brother)
92 VE Powered NX2000(SOLD)
99 G20T 5 SPEED (SOLD)
92 GAY16 B13(FORSALE)
06 M35 5SPD AT NAVI REAR VEIW CAM(DAILY)
TREYDEE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 12:58 AM   #9 (permalink)
Turd Furgeson
 
Benito Malito's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Portland, Or

Feedback Score: 41 reviews
nevermind... I don't know man.
__________________
1992 SuperBlack VVL SE-R
1994 P10 KL0
2004 Forester XT SGM

Last edited by Benito Malito; 09-20-2007 at 01:02 AM.
Benito Malito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 01:29 AM   #10 (permalink)
Travieso Racing

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 1993 Primera GT

Feedback Score: 6 reviews
check timing.. put it back to where it was ..

i bet its something stupid.
remember all the stuff youve touched since exchanging the sr16 cams an n1 cams.

fuel pressure
timing off distrib
__________________
Danny GDM (HKS)
1993 PRiMERA GT
Nissan Ecology Oriented Variable Valve Lift and Timing

Last edited by HkSBlueBird4u; 09-20-2007 at 01:31 AM.
HkSBlueBird4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 02:09 AM   #11 (permalink)
Enemy of the stupid

 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Moreno Valley, Ca

Feedback Score: 9 reviews
If you have a exhaust leak it's prob whats killing your #'s because it's really killing the A/F numbers lol looks like it's going to blow at those #'s.
__________________
95 240sx The RB20 night stalker
91 NX2000 VE forsale
95 240sx stock and slow new daily
Protech-Fabrication
http://www.OSRdyno.com/
Yellow4g63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 12:40 PM   #12 (permalink)
the proof wizard

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota

Feedback Score: 26 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow4g63 View Post
If you have a exhaust leak it's prob whats killing your #'s because it's really killing the A/F numbers lol looks like it's going to blow at those #'s.
i konw the afr is right because with the old header it was a steady 13.7-8. then a few days later once i put the header on its now all crazy, it explaines a lot. and i know its leaking.

also i think that with the slip fit leaking i will loose power because then the collector isnt seeing the same volume and in turn loosing velocity. idk im going to try and weld the header into a 1piece. but that still doesnt explaine the lose since my old graphs.

and ofcourse cam timing, dist timing and all are in check.
coryb13ser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 01:31 PM   #13 (permalink)
Old Kid driving....

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Phoenix

Feedback Score: 9 reviews
Did you ever test the N1s with your old header? Maybe you should put it back on and see if that makes a significant difference. Your custom header is badass but unless you address the leaks you can't rule it out as the problem. Who knows, after you get your airflow in check and you still have a noticeable loss it might be time to think about upgrading to 370 cc injectors or maybe upgrade your fuel pump. You do have an AFPR, right? If not maybe that's all you will need as well as fixing the leaks. Just a thought.....
__________________
91 SE-R VE road racer
94 SE-R VE garage queen
87 Hardbody King Cab V6 daily
blusteelsr20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 02:19 PM   #14 (permalink)
Enemy of the stupid

 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Moreno Valley, Ca

Feedback Score: 9 reviews
...............

Quote:
Originally Posted by coryb13ser View Post
i konw the afr is right because with the old header it was a steady 13.7-8. then a few days later once i put the header on its now all crazy, it explaines a lot. and i know its leaking.

also i think that with the slip fit leaking i will loose power because then the collector isnt seeing the same volume and in turn loosing velocity. idk im going to try and weld the header into a 1piece. but that still doesnt explaine the lose since my old graphs.

and ofcourse cam timing, dist timing and all are in check.

I remember back in the day when I had my Hotshot header on my old SE-R. The thing was a monster I couldn't launch it anymore the same way I use too. My 1/4 mile times went down a bit and my mph went up. One day I went back to the track to race a friend I knew I should be able to beat but couldn't my car got so slow and I couldn't figure it out. I checked the header a week later and found a crack at the collector weld!!! I couldn't belive it killed so much power. I went from a 14.7 to 16.0 because of that freaking crack. Can you put a tighter spring on it maybe to close it up more.
Yellow4g63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 05:57 PM   #15 (permalink)
Turd Furgeson
 
Benito Malito's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Portland, Or

Feedback Score: 41 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by blusteelsr20 View Post
Did you ever test the N1s with your old header? Maybe you should put it back on and see if that makes a significant difference. Your custom header is badass but unless you address the leaks you can't rule it out as the problem. Who knows, after you get your airflow in check and you still have a noticeable loss it might be time to think about upgrading to 370 cc injectors or maybe upgrade your fuel pump. You do have an AFPR, right? If not maybe that's all you will need as well as fixing the leaks. Just a thought.....
That's what I was writing last night, but he dynoed the 16ve cams and SSAC2.5. Then he changed to N1s and dynoed with the 2.5. Then redyno-ed it N1s and custom header.

Have you checked the manifold for blowby? Since I recently broke down my VE I noticed that the pcv hose was giving me a pretty steady supply of oil particularly in cylinders 1 and 2.
Benito Malito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 06:04 PM   #16 (permalink)
Jah Rastafari

 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Miami, Florida

Feedback Score: 61 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benito Malito View Post
That's what I was writing last night, but he dynoed the 16ve cams and SSAC2.5. Then he changed to N1s and dynoed with the 2.5. Then redyno-ed it N1s and custom header.

Have you checked the manifold for blowby? Since I recently broke down my VE I noticed that the pcv hose was giving me a pretty steady supply of oil particularly in cylinders 1 and 2.
The oil going out the valve cover via the PVC into the plenum is not blow by. When you let off the gas the in high RPMs the vacum from the plenum opens the PCV valve and sucks oil vapor into the plenum. This happebs on all motors and is desined to do so.

The reason why there is more oil around the 1 and 2 cylinders is because the inlet for the plenum from the PCV is between those to cylinders. All VVL motors that I have opened look like that.
__________________
If you need any help with your car and you cant solve the problem, call me at 305-282-3643

Overcome With Love And Life, With Truth and Right, So Seek Happiness Before Vengence
Andreas Miko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 06:11 PM   #17 (permalink)
Turd Furgeson
 
Benito Malito's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Portland, Or

Feedback Score: 41 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andreas Miko View Post
The oil going out the valve cover via the PVC into the plenum is not blow by. When you let off the gas the in high RPMs the vacum from the plenum opens the PCV valve and sucks oil vapor into the plenum. This happebs on all motors and is desined to do so.

The reason why there is more oil around the 1 and 2 cylinders is because the inlet for the plenum from the PCV is between those to cylinders. All VVL motors that I have opened look like that.
Well I only opened one. Sorry Cory I don't have anything more for you.
Benito Malito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 06:49 PM   #18 (permalink)
Jah Rastafari

 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Miami, Florida

Feedback Score: 61 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benito Malito View Post
Well I only opened one. Sorry Cory I don't have anything more for you.
I dont know what to think either of this situation.

I do know a leak in the exhaust will not make the car run lean. I will give a lean reading because air is being pulled into the system during a pull on the dyno so it appears to be running lean because of the air diluting the gases. A cloosed loop pull goes directly to the map on the ECU.

What he need to do is get it on the dyno.

Set the TPS at .46 ( my favorite setting)
make a pull. If the car appears to run lean like it shows on the graph then use the regulator to richen up the mixture. Do so in 5 PSi incraments and see if the top end goes up.

Also as I was looking at the post with the header. The transistion of the hcoolector seems to be very quick and when going for bi hp you need a transition in the collector with less angle to it.

I feel this car will make about 205 WHP it just need some playing around with on the dyno.

I have also found that the N1 cams like alot less timing on the top check and see if you have the correct map.
Andreas Miko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 11:21 PM   #19 (permalink)
SE-R Geek
 
myprojectB13's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Claymont, Delaware

Feedback Score: 17 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by coryb13ser View Post
i konw the afr is right because with the old header it was a steady 13.7-8.
Have you tried a richer mixture on the dyno?
__________________
Jonathon
1991 SE-R 12.28@114 T28 RETIRED
1996 G20
1993 SE-R 13.35@102
myprojectB13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2007, 11:56 PM   #20 (permalink)
SNAIL SQUAD
 
SE-Rican's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Avon, OH

Feedback Score: 12 reviews
Cory, what are you tuning this car with?
__________________
SR20Deep
~2012 Convention Info Thread~
http://www.sr20-forum.com/sr20-natio...tion-info.html


Check us out on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/pages/2012-S...=wall&filter=2
SE-Rican is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  SR20 Forum > Main Forums > SR20VE / SR16VE


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
© The SR20 Forum - Content from this site may not be used without permission