Nissan SR20 Forum Nissan SR20 Forum Header Right

Welcome to the SR20 Forum!

A community of enthusiasts dedicated to Nissan's SR20DE/SR20VE/SR20DET engines.
Start here: forum search. Be sure to search on what you're looking for before posting a new thread.

You are currently browsing the forum as a guest. In order to access special features, the image gallery, and post you will need to be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator.

Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Wheel & Tire Center

Sponsors

Sponsors


Go Back   SR20 Forum > Main Forums > SR20VE / SR16VE



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-20-2004, 07:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
VE powered

 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)
New dyno numbers

I just returned home from the dyno with the latest numbers. The last time I had just added a 2.5" exhaust to replace my HKS and put down 178.0 hp and 140.7 lb-ft. This time I installed a test pipe and put down 183.0 hp and 146.9 lb-ft (SAE corrected, the uncorrected numbers were 193.9/155.6). This was on a Dynojet 248.

Eric, I have a copy of the data files so if you PM me your e-mail address I can send them to you.

My mods are: stock SR20VE, 3" PR CAI, Fujitsubo header, custom "Chase Race" 2.5" exhaust with Magnaflow muffler, 2.5" test pipe, JWT ECU, JUN lightweight flywheel, autocross alignment (-2.5 deg camber, 1/8" toe out).

Steve
autoxer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-20-2004, 09:17 PM   #2 (permalink)
Jah Rastafari

 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Miami, Florida
Trader Rating: 55 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by autoxer7
I just returned home from the dyno with the latest numbers. The last time I had just added a 2.5" exhaust to replace my HKS and put down 178.0 hp and 140.7 lb-ft. This time I installed a test pipe and put down 183.0 hp and 146.9 lb-ft (SAE corrected, the uncorrected numbers were 193.9/155.6). This was on a Dynojet 248.

Eric, I have a copy of the data files so if you PM me your e-mail address I can send them to you.

My mods are: stock SR20VE, 3" PR CAI, Fujitsubo header, custom "Chase Race" 2.5" exhaust with Magnaflow muffler, 2.5" test pipe, JWT ECU, JUN lightweight flywheel, autocross alignment (-2.5 deg camber, 1/8" toe out).

Steve
I have a set of Blue Valve Cover 175 hp SR16VE cams which will give you another 8-10 more WHP. If you are interested I want $400 for them.
__________________
If you need any help with your car and you cant solve the problem, call me at 305-282-3643

Overcome With Love And Life, With Truth and Right, So Seek Happiness Before Vengence
Andreas Miko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 09:41 PM   #3 (permalink)
SE-R BUM

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal
Trader Rating: 1 (100%)

NICE NUMBERS! I wonder how it would be if you had a 3 in catback and sr16ve cams...you would gain a lot of ponies... but anyways congrats on your dopea$$ motor!
BEAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 10:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
I need me SE-R

 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sacramento, Ca(ROSEVILLE)
Trader Rating: 3 (100%)

what. sh*t must be like...wooooooooooooooooooooo. i just got my jun flywheel today! you wouldnt happen to have a pic of it would you? i just wanna make sure its the correct one .

nice numbers. maken me jealous!!!!!!!!!
mYseRgOesvrOOm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 10:06 PM   #5 (permalink)
.....

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pueblo West, CO.
Trader Rating: 12 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by autoxer7
I just returned home from the dyno with the latest numbers. The last time I had just added a 2.5" exhaust to replace my HKS and put down 178.0 hp and 140.7 lb-ft. This time I installed a test pipe and put down 183.0 hp and 146.9 lb-ft (SAE corrected, the uncorrected numbers were 193.9/155.6). This was on a Dynojet 248.

Eric, I have a copy of the data files so if you PM me your e-mail address I can send them to you.

My mods are: stock SR20VE, 3" PR CAI, Fujitsubo header, custom "Chase Race" 2.5" exhaust with Magnaflow muffler, 2.5" test pipe, JWT ECU, JUN lightweight flywheel, autocross alignment (-2.5 deg camber, 1/8" toe out).

Steve
Good numbers. Must have been nice and cold for those corrected numbers to be so high.
__________________
Steve

06 G35 6MT
98sr20ve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2004, 12:55 AM   #6 (permalink)
VE powered

 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andreas Miko
I have a set of Blue Valve Cover 175 hp SR16VE cams which will give you another 8-10 more WHP. If you are interested I want $400 for them.
I've been thinking about getting a set although since I'm burning a bit too much oil I'm thinking I'd like to get my bottom end rebuilt first with your 90mm overbore kit... possibly even buy an SR16VE with your built bottom end and 86mm crank. Let's talk after you get your killer VE motor done.

Steve
autoxer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2004, 01:00 AM   #7 (permalink)
VE powered

 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mYseRgOesvrOOm
i just got my jun flywheel today! you wouldnt happen to have a pic of it would you? i just wanna make sure its the correct one .
Sorry I don't have pics. AFAIK, the regular JUN lightweight (10.5 lbs) is solid and the ultra-lightweight (9.5 lbs) has holes drilled at the perimeter.

Steve
autoxer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2004, 01:01 AM   #8 (permalink)
VE powered

 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 98sr20ve
Good numbers. Must have been nice and cold for those corrected numbers to be so high.
54.3 deg F, 30.26 in Hg, humidity 53% = SAE correction factor of 0.94

Don't worry. Your numbers are still better!

Steve

Last edited by autoxer7 : 01-21-2004 at 01:07 AM.
autoxer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2004, 09:27 AM   #9 (permalink)
.....

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pueblo West, CO.
Trader Rating: 12 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by autoxer7
54.3 deg F, 30.26 in Hg, humidity 53% = SAE correction factor of 0.94

Don't worry. Your numbers are still better!

Steve
LOL. That is not the thing.

Those are good numbers. It's just interesting to me that pretty much everyone with the same basic setup is running the same basic numbers within a 3whp of eachother with the same basic setup on the same basic dyno. sr20 cams and I/H/E = about 180whp give or take a little on the dynojet. You are actually ahead of me when I had those cams. Can't wait to see you guys start doing cams and stuff. With a little love and attention I am sure several of you guys engines could hit over 190whp with the same basic setup as mine. I am basically done with the VE. I have started the 240 project and that is were my money is going next. I am convinced the sr16 cams can yield over 190whp with just a little love and care.
98sr20ve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2004, 04:44 PM   #10 (permalink)
Infiniti Parts Guy

 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Trader Rating: 1 (100%)

Sweet, Nice numbers!

I can't wait to see the dyno graph, to see where your setup makes its power. It makes a few more hp than mine, probably due to the lighter flywheel (mine's about 13lbs) and the fujitsubo header, but otherwise sounds very similar.

You make more hp, but slightly less peak torque (than I did) which leads me to think your header probably allows more top end power, where my HS header gives more mid range power. It could just be the cam switching rpms too though, that did affect my torque peak a little bit, due to how it falls with the cam switching rpms....
__________________
Justin McClanahan
2007 350Z
JustinP10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2004, 09:29 PM   #11 (permalink)
SE-R Master
 
eric96ser's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Nashville TN
Trader Rating: 16 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinP10
Sweet, Nice numbers!

I can't wait to see the dyno graph, to see where your setup makes its power. It makes a few more hp than mine, probably due to the lighter flywheel (mine's about 13lbs) and the fujitsubo header, but otherwise sounds very similar.

You make more hp, but slightly less peak torque (than I did) which leads me to think your header probably allows more top end power, where my HS header gives more mid range power. It could just be the cam switching rpms too though, that did affect my torque peak a little bit, due to how it falls with the cam switching rpms....
I've noticed the Fujitsubo killed some of the low end power, but the car still pulls like mad to 8,000. I haven't dynoed yet, and I'm still using the crossover points that worked best with the HS header. I think the longer primary runners are why the lowend torque went down, but it sure does flow better. I have a copy of his dyno chart, I'll email it to you sometime Justin.
__________________
1996 200SX SE-R VE powered
1991 Sentra SE-R
2004 Subaru Forester turbo
2006 Mitsubishi Evolution IX

The community is here.
eric96ser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2004, 10:24 PM   #12 (permalink)
.....

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pueblo West, CO.
Trader Rating: 12 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by eric96ser
I've noticed the Fujitsubo killed some of the low end power, but the car still pulls like mad to 8,000. I haven't dynoed yet, and I'm still using the crossover points that worked best with the HS header. I think the longer primary runners are why the lowend torque went down, but it sure does flow better. I have a copy of his dyno chart, I'll email it to you sometime Justin.
I doubt you lost any low end. My guess is the upper range is soo much better that it just feels that way.
98sr20ve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2004, 12:20 AM   #13 (permalink)
SE-R Nut

 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: WA
Trader Rating: 6 (100%)

Drooool

congrats. nice enough #'s to give DAN the incentive to finally swap in his "dust collecting" ve?
__________________
Ric
VePwrd 97 Se-r (jwt free)
VqPwrd 07 Fronty
Teal97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2004, 12:34 AM   #14 (permalink)
VE powered

 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric96ser
I've noticed the Fujitsubo killed some of the low end power, but the car still pulls like mad to 8,000.
When I swapped my HS3 for the Fujitsubo I still had the HKS exhaust and cat, but I didn't experience any difference on the low end. However, when I swapped the HKS for my 2.5" exhaust I noticed a definite improvement in the low end. Adding a test pipe also yielded a measureable improvement.

Steve
autoxer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2004, 04:10 AM   #15 (permalink)
BAD FKR

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Always at work
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)
Quote:
Originally Posted by autoxer7
I just returned home from the dyno with the latest numbers. The last time I had just added a 2.5" exhaust to replace my HKS and put down 178.0 hp and 140.7 lb-ft. This time I installed a test pipe and put down 183.0 hp and 146.9 lb-ft (SAE corrected, the uncorrected numbers were 193.9/155.6). This was on a Dynojet 248.

Eric, I have a copy of the data files so if you PM me your e-mail address I can send them to you.

My mods are: stock SR20VE, 3" PR CAI, Fujitsubo header, custom "Chase Race" 2.5" exhaust with Magnaflow muffler, 2.5" test pipe, JWT ECU, JUN lightweight flywheel, autocross alignment (-2.5 deg camber, 1/8" toe out).

Steve
Nice numbers
__________________
91 SE-R w/VVL inside
Car in TX sleeping for now and I am in ND
san-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2004, 12:09 PM   #16 (permalink)
SE-R Nut

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Trader Rating: 8 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teal97
congrats. nice enough #'s to give DAN the incentive to finally swap in his "dust collecting" ve?
Yup, we're shooting for the weekend after next. You still going to be in NY around then?
Dan_93SER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2004, 01:40 PM   #17 (permalink)
SE-R Nut

 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: WA
Trader Rating: 6 (100%)

yup, unfortunately.
Teal97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2004, 01:46 PM   #18 (permalink)
SE-R Master
 
eric96ser's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Nashville TN
Trader Rating: 16 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 98sr20ve
I doubt you lost any low end. My guess is the upper range is soo much better that it just feels that way.
I might be dynoing tomorrow, so we'll see then. I really wanted to have more RPM pills before then, but this was a last minute decision.
eric96ser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2005, 06:56 PM   #19 (permalink)
done

 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nowhere
Trader Rating: 7 (100%)

LOL, i know this thread is old, but i was just looking around at VE stuff, found this thread... ITs funny but I have this dyno sheet layin around here somewhere. I dyno at the same place this guy did. Its a pretty nice curve I must say.

yes i know this thread is really old...
SR20Turbofreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 08:30 PM   #20 (permalink)
SE-R Nut

 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: florida/caribbean
Trader Rating: 9 (100%)

damn i was actually looking at some ve stuff too didnt even notice that it was an old thread!! number look good! wish i could see the graph!
anomaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply



  SR20 Forum > Main Forums > SR20VE / SR16VE


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
</