A community of enthusiasts dedicated to Nissan's SR20DE/SR20VE/SR20DET engines.
Start here: forum search. Be sure to search on what you're looking for before posting a new thread.
You are currently browsing the forum as a guest. In order to access special features, the image gallery, and post you will need to be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator.
Okay, I've searched but couldn't find an answer. Is a GTi-R head highport, or lowport?
I dont think you searched very much. The GTI-R is completly different with a mechanical valve train. It has Individual throttle bodies and a completly different intake manifold of course.
Black '95 200sx SE-R Turbo Lowport 286whp/245wtq 12.306 @ 113.55
White '92 NX2000 All Stock.
White '92 NX2000 Automatic, stock, not moving, and FOR SALE <---- Click for Pics
Quote:
Originally Posted by BORNGEARHEAD
It's pathetic the amount of people in this country that believe all the bullsh*t being spewed out the mouths of Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rice, Snow, oil companies, lobbyists, etc.
the gti-r head is a high port 54chead
even though the intake runers are diferent the bolt pattern is pretty much the same. it is possible to bolt the throttle bodies to a nomal 53j high port head but some port matching is to be done for it to fit perfectly
The 94 SER was faster than the 91-93 SER. The 94 SER ran quicker 1/4mile times and had a higher top end.
The 200 sx SERs were slower than the earlier SERs but would still get to 130 without the governor.
91-93 SER was rated at 125 MPH had a few freinds that could only get to 125 with there SERs.
94 SER was rated at 130 MPH, my 94 did this stock
91-93 NX2000 did 130 MPH but it was more aerodynamic. The NX2000 had a little more weight to it so it was slower than the 91-94 SERs in the 1/4 mile.
91-93 SERs always put dowm more WHP than the 94-99 lowports but they did make less WHP
91-93 SERs make about 125-127 WHP in stock form
95-99 SERs make about 117-121 WHP in stock form.
These diffrences are due to many things.
91-93 SER has bigger intake cam
94 SER cam is a littler smaller than the 91-93 SER but it is larger than the 95-99 cars.
91-94 SER has bigger exhaust 1 3/4 exhaust from cat back
95-99 SER has 1 1/2 in exhaust from cat back
Now 95-99 SERs will do 130 MPH top end with a G20 ECU even though they make less hp, I think this is due to the better CD of the car.
91-94 SERs have the same weight as long as they have the same stuff.
Alot of variables to consider but thats what I know and have experemented with.
__________________
If you need any help with your car and you cant solve the problem, call me at 305-282-3643
Overcome With Love And Life, With Truth and Right, So Seek Happiness Before Vengence
Nice layout Andre. I didn't know that about the "94 SE-R" being the fastest of the (91-99) B13 and B14's from stock. What about the sr20 cars of 00 and 01? Where any of the g20's faster? That makes me wonder about the "94 g20" on it's stock performance.
where are the injectors/throttle bodies? god i feel like a n00b right now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmilyFace
I know that MOMO hubs crush and save you. In case of an accident those long bolts in my hub are supposed to go right thorough my heart... ...so that I don't have to suffer, and die happy.
let me dumb it down....describe where the throttle body is on the highport.As if i've never seen one **.
Down the back of the engine, just follow the air intake pipe from the filter. On the low port it is high up and easily accessible, on the high port it is lower down...
so are the highport and lowport fuel rails able to be switch with eachother and they just have different intake manfiolds i know that. and does the top mount bluebird work with the lowport since the intake monifold is higher?
__________________
99 Sentra SE-L (Turbo)
*T25 Turbo/3" Downpipe/Nismo AFPR/370cc/Calum ECU*
*Hypercos W/AGX's and ME Rear Mounts*
*VRS 2.5" Exhaust*
*NX2000 Brakes*
*Highport Cam*
14.27@100mph 213whp 198tq. Old Setup
New Setup Coming Soon!! GT28R
i think hes saying it makes less hp at 130mph...which is cool because with the stock ecu...you wouldnt even get to see passed 113mph..so im not complaining..
so are the highport and lowport fuel rails able to be switch with eachother and they just have different intake manfiolds i know that. and does the top mount bluebird work with the lowport since the intake monifold is higher?
--- Fuel rails bolt up differently on hp and lp SR's,
--- bluebird top mount won't bolt up in rear w/ the brackets because the lowports top intake plenum is higher, you will not be able to run that stock U-pipe from the cold side of TM intercooler to the plenum w/o some sort of fab because the turn is too sharp. Even if you did it succesfully it would be cocked all wierd and look unnatural.
i.e. when the time comes, leave your fuel rail in, switch in the 370cc's your going to purchase, and buy a piping setup used on the forum
so the pic on the bottom is a low-port? and the one on the top is a hight port? i thought that the one on the bottom is a high port because the intake manifold is higher than that of the other 1. just confused a bit.
so the pic on the bottom is a low-port? and the one on the top is a hight port? i thought that the one on the bottom is a high port because the intake manifold is higher than that of the other 1. just confused a bit.
You're looking at the intake/plenum. The ports on the head are higher than the intake on a high port and vice-versa on the low port.
god i feel like a n00b right now.
