Nissan SR20 Forum Nissan SR20 Forum Header Right

Welcome to the SR20 Forum!

A community of enthusiasts dedicated to Nissan's SR20DE/SR20VE/SR20DET engines.
Start here: forum search. Be sure to search on what you're looking for before posting a new thread.

You are currently browsing the forum as a guest. In order to access special features, the image gallery, and post you will need to be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator.

Google Links

» Wheel & Tire Center

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Sponsors

Sponsors


Go Back   SR20 Forum > What's New > Technical Information Library




Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-08-2004, 08:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
sr20boston
1998ccs of fury

 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: NH
Trader Rating: 15 (100%)

HOW TO: Do I have a low port or high port?

High-port - throttle body sits below the injectors (you can see the injectors but not the throttle body).




Low-port - throttle body sits above the injectors (you can see the throttle body but not the injectors).



91-93 SE-Rs, 91-93 NX2000s and 90-93 G20s had high-ports, while '94 and above SE-Rs and G20s had low-ports.

Source: Harris
sr20boston is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-27-2004, 02:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
nx2kjl
Do the non-believers Bad.

 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Clearfield, UT
Trader Rating: 1 (100%)

Damned interesting. Is there a ifferance in the performance? it seems to me that maybe the low port might keep a little cooler.....hmmm.
__________________
Jerimiah ------

1999 G20 - The new twinkle in my eye.
nx2kjl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2004, 05:23 AM   #3 (permalink)
Will
oh so LAZY

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gainesville/Lauderdale
Trader Rating: 8 (100%)

they both make 140 crank hp. but people say the highport is a little quicker...i love my lowport, plus the whole head is more efficient, the hp remains the same because the lowport has a less aggressive cam grind, so if you put the intake cam from a highport in a lowport you get about 5-7 hp more, it is noticable.
__________________
Click for My Car Pics

Black '95 200sx SE-R Turbo Lowport 286whp/245wtq 12.306 @ 113.55

White '92 NX2000 All Stock.

White '92 NX2000 Automatic, stock, not moving, and FOR SALE <---- Click for Pics

Quote:
Originally Posted by BORNGEARHEAD View Post
It's pathetic the amount of people in this country that believe all the bullsh*t being spewed out the mouths of Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rice, Snow, oil companies, lobbyists, etc.
Will is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2004, 08:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
vqman
sold the NX after 2 mos..
 
vqman's Avatar

I support the SR20 Forum!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Merriam, KS
Trader Rating: 11 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by nx2kjl
Damned interesting. Is there a ifferance in the performance? it seems to me that maybe the low port might keep a little cooler.....hmmm.

I have heard the low port engine with the high port cams installed is the best USDM setup you can get...

the low port makes 140 hp just like the high port, but I believe I read that it's a cleaner engine..so then when you put the "dirty cams" on an engine that has "clean cams" and still puts out 140 hp....theory...

someone delete this if I'm wrong...
__________________
__________________________
2004 | black | g35 sedan | stillen front & rear sways
magna flow catback| stillen cai | contemplating ecu and cams
vqman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2004, 07:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
Will
oh so LAZY

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gainesville/Lauderdale
Trader Rating: 8 (100%)

huh? the highport intake cam is more aggressive than the lowport intake cam, if you consider this "dirty". the exhaust cams are exactly the same. it is proven that the highport cam in the lowport motor makes about 7whp more than stock.
Will is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2004, 11:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
Harris
Coropate greed hater

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ft. Riley, KS
Trader Rating: 2 (100%)

I think that when he says "dirty", he means that the high-port cam would result in somewhat higher emmissions readings. Eh, like we care.
__________________
"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist".

-The Usual Suspects
Harris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 02:04 PM   #7 (permalink)
UK-SRi
SE-R Nut

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Guildford UK
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)

The highport head has more emmissions because the injectors were further away from the valves, so the cam will have minimal effect on emmisions I would have thought.

Mike
UK-SRi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2005, 01:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
200sx_TT
SE-R Geek

 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the US.
Trader Rating: 1 (100%)
highport is quicker cause its sitting in a lighter body!...but the lowport 94 sentra SER is about the same so there should be no difference. Plus if the lowport gain 5-7 hp with the highport cam, that makes the lowport 147 compare to the highport 140!!! You have to think that with the larger cam, the highport only make 140hp and the lowport with its smaller cam still makes the same...I go with lowport!
200sx_TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2005, 07:03 PM   #9 (permalink)
Harris
Coropate greed hater

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ft. Riley, KS
Trader Rating: 2 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 200sx_TT
highport is quicker cause its sitting in a lighter body!...but the lowport 94 sentra SER is about the same so there should be no difference. Plus if the lowport gain 5-7 hp with the highport cam, that makes the lowport 147 compare to the highport 140!!! You have to think that with the larger cam, the highport only make 140hp and the lowport with its smaller cam still makes the same...I go with lowport!

Don't take offense, but you don't know what you're talking about. The SE-R was pretty much the same weight from '91 to '94. And who said that the high-port was faster? I've disproved that many times (not in the form of documentation, but in races with B13 owner who have high-ports). It ultimately depends on the driver, not only the type of head you got when doing a stock-to-stock comparison. Get your facts straight man. The cam stuff, you are ok with, but that other thing you said... it's a bit laughable dude.
Harris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2005, 02:04 AM   #10 (permalink)
200sx_TT
SE-R Geek

 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the US.
Trader Rating: 1 (100%)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harris
Don't take offense, but you don't know what you're talking about. The SE-R was pretty much the same weight from '91 to '94. And who said that the high-port was faster? I've disproved that many times (not in the form of documentation, but in races with B13 owner who have high-ports). It ultimately depends on the driver, not only the type of head you got when doing a stock-to-stock comparison. Get your facts straight man. The cam stuff, you are ok with, but that other thing you said... it's a bit laughable dude.
no offensive taken but you should learn to understand what you read before you post! "but the lowport 94 sentra SER is about the same so there should be no difference"....

from 91-93 its all high port, and late 94 sentra are low port so in term of weight, there should be no difference. But the majority of lowport are 200sx, and if you check, they weight more than the 91-94 sentras...and if you ever run before you should know that weight makes a huge difference!! Also to answer what you say about racing b13 owners, hell i can beat a formula 1 racer with my 1.5 tercel, if he cant drive!! So we are not talking about drivers, just comparing the lowport and high port. basically sentra to 200sx.
200sx_TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2005, 02:27 AM   #11 (permalink)
Will
oh so LAZY

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gainesville/Lauderdale
Trader Rating: 8 (100%)

the b14 only weighs 83 lbs more than the b13.
Will is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 12:06 AM   #12 (permalink)
Nismo Powered
SE-R Newbie

 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Jamaica
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)
a bit of a nooB here, but whats *** whole talk bout high and low port
Nismo Powered is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 09:29 AM   #13 (permalink)
B15sentraDE
finally got a classic

 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Reading PA
Trader Rating: 22 (100%)

the picture and explaination in the first post should explain it
__________________
b13 with high compression and S4's


soon to be on squeeze!
B15sentraDE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 04:29 PM   #14 (permalink)
420sxDET
SE-R Nut

 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pasadena
Trader Rating: 2 (100%)
OK OK, you guys have good arguements, but what is the real question is how much does each head flow on a flow bench? Anyone done a flow bench on low port vs high port? Is a low port s14 and s15 head the same as a sentra low port? There is a big arguement among 240sx people of the s13 engine vs s14 and s15. besides price, which one really flows more???
__________________
"A couple of Nissan Sr20's will pull a premium one week before race wars." (Johnny Tran, fast and furious) LOL
420sxDET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 06:40 PM   #15 (permalink)
Will
oh so LAZY

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gainesville/Lauderdale
Trader Rating: 8 (100%)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 420sxDET
OK OK, you guys have good arguements, but what is the real question is how much does each head flow on a flow bench? Anyone done a flow bench on low port vs high port? Is a low port s14 and s15 head the same as a sentra low port? There is a big arguement among 240sx people of the s13 engine vs s14 and s15. besides price, which one really flows more???
IIRC, there is no such thing as a lowport DET motor. The lowport must flow a bit better than the highport, because they make the same stock HP and the lowport has a less agressive intake cam. This is why the highport intake cam will make like 7whp when used in the lowport.
Will is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2006, 04:34 AM   #16 (permalink)
UK-SRi
SE-R Nut

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Guildford UK
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)

The highport comes into its own if you make a 9 k beast out of it.

Mike
UK-SRi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2006, 03:47 PM   #17 (permalink)
420sxDET
SE-R Nut

 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pasadena
Trader Rating: 2 (100%)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will
IIRC, there is no such thing as a lowport DET motor. The lowport must flow a bit better than the highport, because they make the same stock HP and the lowport has a less agressive intake cam. This is why the highport intake cam will make like 7whp when used in the lowport.
The low port DET engine comes off a s14 or s15, sorry I shoulda have mentioned the rwd sr20's, most the discussions here are assumed fwd. Those low ports have vtc.
420sxDET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 06:25 PM   #18 (permalink)
iz_cool
SE-R Newbie

 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philippines
Trader Rating: 0 (0%)
Hi guys was just wondering what would happen if you combined a highport injectors with a low port head.

Thanks
iz_cool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 10:54 PM   #19 (permalink)
R0b_
Enjoy the GTR Matt!

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SE
Trader Rating: 23 (100%)

Nothing, they are both the same.
__________________
Sweet '93 NX DE+T GT28RS- For Sale
R0b_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2006, 02:10 PM   #20 (permalink)
skyvia
SE-R Newbie

 
Join Date: May 2004
Trader Rating: 1 (100%)
Okay, I've searched but couldn't find an answer. Is a GTi-R head highport, or lowport?
skyvia is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply