G
Guest
·I have been reading some of the post on this boards regarding car comparison, mainly, the V-Spec and WRX, and now the RSX. I know that everyone will bias towards a certain car, no matter what, but some of the things i've heard is just plain stupid. Let's talk about the SE-R and WRX. I've heard things like "it's not worth the money for a WRX when you can spend 5 grand less and slap on a turbo on a V-Spec and eat the WRX". You are an idiot if you are going to do that. First of all, you don't buy a brand new car and instantly void your warranty by slapping on a turbo. If you do that, you are just plain stupid.You will think it's cool and make you fast, but when it all comes down to it, you won't do it. You lose warranty, and that is a big factor, because chances are, you WILL blow something and no one buys a brand new car only to have it break. In the end, you paid less, but you also get less of a car. The WRX may cost 5grand more, but you get A LOT more, everything warranted.
"For that kinda money, I'd rather wait for the EVO IV"
Please do some research. A brand new WRX costs $25k . A brand new EVO is estimated to cost $30k. A brand new STi is estimated to cost $30k . If you rather spend the extra 5k to get a EVO, then your arguement that you would not spend the extra 5k over a V-SPEC to get WRX is completely stupid. There's no arguement here.
"I've test drove a WRX and i'm not impressed, the V-SPEC handles better" . Well guess what buddy, you have NOT test drove a V-SPEC yourself, have you ? How can you even make this arguement without testing both cars yourself. If the only thing you read is from an article, you'll notice both articles will complement both cars, so that is not a valid arguement. And trust me, the WRX handles great.
"The WRX is butt ugly, the V-SPEC is lovely" . A Ferrari is beautiful, a McLaren is gorgeous. WRX, Sentra or any other char in that catagory is all ugly. It's all up in your head. If you own a sentra, you will say a sentra is gorgeous, no matter how ugly it is. Sit back and think for a moment, if you didn't own a classic SE-R, do you REALLY REALLY think that car is beautiful ? And if you do own a classic and say the WRX is ugly while your sentra is nice looking, then you are delusional.
Flame on
"For that kinda money, I'd rather wait for the EVO IV"
Please do some research. A brand new WRX costs $25k . A brand new EVO is estimated to cost $30k. A brand new STi is estimated to cost $30k . If you rather spend the extra 5k to get a EVO, then your arguement that you would not spend the extra 5k over a V-SPEC to get WRX is completely stupid. There's no arguement here.
"I've test drove a WRX and i'm not impressed, the V-SPEC handles better" . Well guess what buddy, you have NOT test drove a V-SPEC yourself, have you ? How can you even make this arguement without testing both cars yourself. If the only thing you read is from an article, you'll notice both articles will complement both cars, so that is not a valid arguement. And trust me, the WRX handles great.
"The WRX is butt ugly, the V-SPEC is lovely" . A Ferrari is beautiful, a McLaren is gorgeous. WRX, Sentra or any other char in that catagory is all ugly. It's all up in your head. If you own a sentra, you will say a sentra is gorgeous, no matter how ugly it is. Sit back and think for a moment, if you didn't own a classic SE-R, do you REALLY REALLY think that car is beautiful ? And if you do own a classic and say the WRX is ugly while your sentra is nice looking, then you are delusional.
Flame on
